| XML
About
Home
RSS
OPML
XML-RPC
SOAP
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 Which Creative Commons license?
started 7/7/2003; 1:53:34 PM - last post 10/23/2004; 5:28:06 PM
|
|
Dave Winer - Which Creative Commons license? 
7/7/2003; 1:53:34 PM (reads: 490356, responses: 6)
|
|
Suppose, hypothetically, you were going to release a spec under a Creative Commons license, and you wanted the terms to match, as closely as possible, the Copyright and Disclaimer on the RSS 2.0 spec. Which one would you use?
# Posted on 7/7/03; 1:53:41 PM
|
|
Elmer Masters - Re: Comment on post 392
7/7/2003; 2:51:55 PM (reads: 20892, responses: 5)
|
|
|
Dave,
I'd vote for Attribution-ShareAlike. It seems to match pretty closely with the Copyright and Disclaimer on the RSS 2.0 spec.
|
|
Dave Winer - Re: Comment on post 392
7/7/2003; 3:02:07 PM (reads: 21296, responses: 0)
|
|
|
Elmer, I just got off the phone with Brent Simmons where we walked through this problem, and we came to the same conclusion.
|
|
Danny - Re: Comment on post 392
7/7/2003; 4:32:11 PM (reads: 21375, responses: 0)
|
|
|
Did you try clicking on the three radio buttons on the CC site?
|
|
Phillip Pearson - Re: Comment on post 392
7/7/2003; 5:04:09 PM (reads: 22085, responses: 0)
|
|
|
I'd say Attribution-NoDerivs would suit better, considering the following from the RSS spec: "This document may not be modified in any way" ...
|
|
Josh Johnson - Re: Comment on post 392
7/8/2003; 3:55:21 AM (reads: 22076, responses: 0)
|
|
|
I would say the ShareAlike License is what you are after. My only reservation lies in some confusion about attribution. It seems if one requires that the copyright be maintained in redistribution doesn't that give the original author credit? Apparently not, and thus the distinction. The 'no claim of ownership is made by UserLand to the format it describes' makes me think that Attribution may not be a requirement for the License.
|
|
hair loss solution - Re: Comment on post 392
10/23/2004; 5:28:06 PM (reads: 24615, responses: 0)
|
|
|
You may find it interesting to visit some information in the field of ...
|
|
|
|
